Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a global score of 84.6 against 81.3. The Galaxy A22 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.