Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G construction is noticeably newer, but thicker and heavier than LG V40 ThinQ.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and videos in poorly lited environments and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
LG V40 ThinQ has a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.