Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, getting an 87.1 score against 84.6. The LG Velvet is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but LG managed to make it lighter and thinner anyway. LG Velvet and Galaxy A22 5G feature extremely similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bigger screen.
LG Velvet features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet has a much better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a 48 MP back facing camera, the LG Velvet also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.