Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's general score of 84.6. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and the Galaxy A22 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 construction is a lot heavier but noticeably thinner than the Galaxy A22 5G. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a better resolution of 1892 x 2688px.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.