Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, with a general score of 89.6 against 84.6. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version. Although the Motorola edge is older and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A22 5G, it's design is still a little lighter.
The Motorola edge features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola edge has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola edge features a superior camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola edge also has a back camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and a way better video definition.
Galaxy A22 5G features just a little better battery duration than Motorola edge, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.