Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it's also older, just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with more megapixels. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.