Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's score of 84.6. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, so it counts with some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a better resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.