Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 84.6 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A22 5G design is notably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is incredibly heavier and much thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A22 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger aperture for better low light photography and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.