Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a overall score of 84.6 against 77.4. Galaxy A22 5G's construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G one, they have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A22 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.