Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. The Galaxy A22 5G is a way newer device than Moto Z3, although it's extremely thicker and extremely heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Motorola Moto Z3 feature quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Moto Z3 has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.