Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is slightly better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's just a little thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Motorola One Action both feature very similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola One Action has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola One Action has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.