Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision, with an 84.6 score against 80.7. Even though the Galaxy A22 5G is extremely newer than Motorola One Vision, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola One Vision's processing unit is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G one, they have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels amount per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Motorola One Vision shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.