Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 score. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system. Even when the Motorola razr (2020) and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G were released with only a few months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.