Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. The Galaxy A22 5G design is newer, a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way better resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A22 5G has a bit longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.