Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A40, getting a global score of 84.6 against 79.6. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so both should offer all the same OS features. The Galaxy A22 5G design is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A40's, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A40. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A40 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density.
Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A40, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.