Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than Galaxy A50, having a score of 84.6 against 83.8. The Galaxy A22 5G construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A50. Galaxy A50 has a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G one, because although the Galaxy A50 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.