Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G, having a overall score of 86.6 against 84.6. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A50s construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A22 5G, although it was released just a little more than a year before.
The Galaxy A50s features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A22 5G one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.