Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G's global score of 84.6. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A51 construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A22 5G, even though it was released just 18 months before.
Galaxy A51 counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy A22 5G, because although the Galaxy A51 has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A51 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.