Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A22 5G, having a global score of 90.8 against 84.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is older than the Galaxy A22 5G, it's construction is a bit lighter and a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Galaxy A51 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a display that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy A22 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A22 5G features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, and they both have a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.