Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's general score of 84.6. Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, although they were only released with a couple of months difference. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and the Galaxy A52 5G both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much better (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.