Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a general score of 84.6 against 76.9. Even though Galaxy A22 5G is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A70's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy A22 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a quite higher screen density.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution. The Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.