Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, with a 92.9 score against 84.6. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A22 5G, even though it was released only 11 months before.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit inferior pixels number per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much higher video definition and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.