Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A22 5G's global score of 84.6. Although Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A22 5G, it's construction is still thinner. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A22 5G features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.