Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's overall score of 84.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is older than Galaxy A22 5G, it's design is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter. The Galaxy A22 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G has superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.