Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 overall score. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better video definition and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.