Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, so it gives lots of additional features and better performance. Galaxy A22 5G's design is a lot newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note 3.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A22 5G features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.