Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy A22 5G is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a much better resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.