Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having an 84.6 score against 80.4. The Galaxy A22 5G design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better screen density. The Galaxy A22 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way more MP camera.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.