Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, having an 89 score against 84.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older than Galaxy A22 5G, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy A22 5G, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.