Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy A22 5G, getting a 93.6 score against 84.6. Galaxy S10 5G is an extremely older device than Galaxy A22 5G, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and just a little lighter. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a better pixels density, a little larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.