Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's score of 84.6. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, despite of the fact that it was released around 17 months before. Galaxy A22 5G and Galaxy S10 Lite have extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little better battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.