Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than Galaxy A22 5G's general score of 84.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than Galaxy A22 5G, it's body is lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, giving lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Galaxy S20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.