Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's general score of 84.6. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, providing lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it's just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher 108 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.