Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8, with a global score of 84.6 against 81.7. Galaxy A22 5G's body is notably newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy S8. Galaxy S8 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.