Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, with a score of 84.6 against 81.9. Galaxy A22 5G is a notably newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A22 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.