Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy S9, with a global score of 84.6 against 83.3. Even though the Galaxy A22 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy S9, it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy S9 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Galaxy S9 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.