Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G construction is newer, somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Galaxy A22 5G count with extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A22 5G has a better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.