Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11, providing the user some extra features. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than Galaxy A22 5G, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a just a little higher screen density and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A22 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.