Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, getting a general score of 92.3 against 84.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is a little lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A22 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.