Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, with a 94.6 score against 84.6. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it's noticeably heavier and was released around 9 months before.
Galaxy A22 5G and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.