Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, having a overall score of 84.6 against 79.8. The Galaxy A22 5G body is incredibly newer, but thicker and just a little heavier than Sony Xperia XZ Premium. The Xperia XZ Premium features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Xperia XZ Premium's camera is very similar to the Galaxy A22 5G one, because although the Xperia XZ Premium has a lot lower 19 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 55% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.