Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a global score of 84.6 against 79. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count in each inch of display. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit better processor than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a much worse resolution camera and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A22 5G features a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.