Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium's score of 82.2. The Galaxy A22 5G design is notably newer, lighter and a lot thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a lot better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a much greater pixels quantity per inch in the display. Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a much lower 19 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.