Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Although Galaxy A22 5G and TCL 20 Pro 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A22 5G construction is a little bit heavier but also a little thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a quite better pixels amount per inch of display. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has more internal storage capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G and Galaxy A22 5G both count with quite similar CPUs, and although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a much better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.