Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a score of 84.6 against 81.1. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy A22 5G is a a little lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but both are equally thin.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A22 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy A22 5G one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.