Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is way better than the Galaxy A22, getting a 93.2 score against 76.1. Even though the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max and the Galaxy A22 were released only a couple of months apart, Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's body is heavier but also thinner. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A22 comes with Android 12 OS.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a much higher screen pixels density, a much higher 1284 x 2778px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.