Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 overall score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is just a little thinner but a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22, and they were only released 3 months apart. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A22 works with Android 12 OS.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a way greater pixel amount per inch in the screen.
IPhone 13 Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy A22 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.