Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A22's score of 76.1. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is heavier but a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with Android 12 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a little larger display, a much greater display pixel density and a way better 1284 x 2778 resolution.
Galaxy A22 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.