Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Galaxy A22, with an 88.1 score against 76.1. Apple iPhone X's body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy A22, although it was released 4 years before. IPhone X has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone X features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone X has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone X has a superior battery life than Galaxy A22. IPhone X shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.