Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. IPhone XS's body is just a little thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A22, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone XS counts with a better performance than Galaxy A22, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way better count of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A22 features much more storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The iPhone XS takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Apple iPhone XS features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.